Renewable vs. Fossil Fuel Electricity Costs

How solar, wind, gas, and coal compare on real generating costs, and what the numbers mean for your electricity bill.

Key Takeaway

New solar and wind are now cheaper to build and operate than new coal or oil plants by a significant margin. In the best locations, utility-scale solar produces electricity for under $25/MWh, cheaper than any fossil fuel source. Natural gas remains competitive due to its dispatchability (ability to turn on instantly), but its cost advantage over renewables has largely disappeared except as a backup source. The energy transition is fundamentally an economics story, not just an environmental one.

LCOE: The Right Way to Compare Energy Costs

Different power plants have radically different cost structures. A coal plant is cheap to build but burns expensive fuel for 40 years. A solar farm costs more upfront but has zero fuel costs forever. Comparing them on upfront cost alone is meaningless, you need to calculate the total lifetime cost per unit of electricity produced. That's what Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) does.

LCOE formula: (Total lifetime costs) ÷ (Total lifetime electricity output). It's expressed in dollars per megawatt-hour ($/MWh), equivalent to tenths of a cent per kilowatt-hour. An LCOE of $50/MWh equals 5 cents/kWh.

LCOE includes capital costs (building the plant), operations and maintenance (O&M), fuel costs, and financing. It does not include the cost of storage, transmission upgrades, or backup capacity, which is why it understates the full system cost of intermittent renewables and overstates the cost of dispatchable fossil fuels when comparing them in isolation.

LCOE by Energy Source, 2024 Estimates

Data from Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis (v17.0) and EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2024. Ranges reflect differences in location, financing costs, and project scale.

Energy Source LCOE Low ($/MWh) LCOE High ($/MWh) Dispatchable?
Utility-Scale Solar PV 24 96 No (daytime only)
Onshore Wind 24 75 No (wind-dependent)
Natural Gas Combined Cycle 39 101 Yes (24/7 dispatchable)
Natural Gas Peaker (CC) 115 221 Yes (fast ramp)
Coal (new plant) 65 160 Yes (slow ramp)
Nuclear (new, large-scale) 130 204 Yes (baseload)
Nuclear (existing plants) 29 52 Yes (baseload)
Offshore Wind 72 190 No (wind-dependent)
Geothermal 62 102 Yes (baseload)
Hydroelectric (existing) 19 50 Yes (dispatchable)

Sources: Lazard LCOE Analysis v17.0 (2024); EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2024. Ranges reflect geographic variation and project financing conditions. Does not include grid integration or storage costs.

Solar: The Cost Collapse

No technology has dropped in cost faster than utility-scale solar photovoltaic power. The cost of solar panels has fallen over 90% since 2010. In 2010, utility solar cost around $350/MWh, more than four times the most expensive fossil fuel option. In the best locations today (Texas, California, Arizona), new solar is being contracted at $20-30/MWh, the cheapest source of new electricity ever built.

The driver is manufacturing scale. Solar panels are manufactured goods, and like semiconductors, their cost declines predictably as manufacturing scales up. Each doubling of cumulative installed capacity has reduced panel costs by about 20% (a relationship called Swanson's Law, analogous to Moore's Law for chips). Nothing comparable has happened to coal or gas plant construction costs, those follow general construction inflation.

The limitation: solar only produces during daylight, typically 20-25% of hours per year (capacity factor). A coal plant operates 80%+ of hours. Check solar energy source data for state-level solar generation.

Wind: Competitive Across the Great Plains

Onshore wind is competitive with natural gas across a wide range of conditions, with LCOE as low as $24/MWh in high-wind areas of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and the Dakotas. Wind capacity factors in these regions reach 40-50%, far better than most solar except in the Southwest. This is why Texas, Iowa, and Oklahoma have the most installed wind capacity in the US.

Offshore wind is significantly more expensive ($72-190/MWh) due to higher construction and maintenance costs at sea. However, it offers much higher and more consistent wind speeds than land, and it can be built near East Coast population centers that lack onshore wind resources. The offshore wind industry is navigating cost challenges as steel and labor costs rose sharply after 2020. See wind generation by state.

Natural Gas: Still Competitive, But for Different Reasons

Natural gas combined-cycle plants are no longer the cheapest source of new electricity in most US markets. But they remain essential for a reason LCOE doesn't capture: dispatchability. Gas plants can ramp from zero to full output in 10-20 minutes. Solar and wind cannot. As long as the grid needs instant-response capacity to handle cloudy days, wind lulls, and evening demand spikes, gas plants have value that their LCOE understates.

Gas prices also create significant LCOE uncertainty. The low end of the range assumes roughly $3-4/MMBtu gas. When gas prices spiked to $8+ in 2022, gas LCOE nearly doubled. Solar and wind have no fuel cost exposure, once built, their LCOE is fixed by capital and O&M costs alone. This price certainty is an increasing advantage for renewables in long-term contracts.

See natural gas generation data for state-level reliance on gas. Check price trends to see how gas price spikes flow through to electricity rates.

Coal: The Stranded Asset Problem

No new coal plants are being built in the US. The last coal plant to break ground was in 2017 (a small unit in Alaska). At LCOE of $65-160/MWh for new construction, coal simply cannot compete. Even the "coal is cheap" argument doesn't survive LCOE analysis: once you account for the capital cost of building a new coal plant, it's more expensive than combined-cycle gas, and far more expensive than new solar or wind in most of the country.

The remaining question is what to do with existing coal plants, where the capital cost is already spent. Many existing plants can produce power at $35-55/MWh in fuel and O&M alone, still competitive with new solar in some regions, especially in cloudy northern states. But as carbon regulations tighten and new renewables undercut even those marginal costs, existing coal is being retired at an accelerating pace. See coal's declining share by state.

What This Means for Future Electricity Rates

The economics of the energy transition suggest electricity rates will face competing pressures:

  • Downward pressure: New renewable capacity with near-zero fuel costs gradually displaces expensive gas and coal in the generation mix. As the grid's marginal cost falls, wholesale electricity prices should decline.
  • Upward pressure: Grid modernization costs (new transmission lines to connect remote wind and solar), storage (batteries to manage intermittency), and retirement of paid-off coal plants before their natural end of life all impose real costs on ratepayers.
  • Net effect: Highly renewable regions with good resources and permissive grid permitting may see lower rates. Regions with extensive legacy infrastructure requiring replacement, or those building expensive offshore wind, may see rates rise before they fall.

Track how your state's generation mix is evolving with RateWatt's state pages, which show both current rates and the energy source breakdown driving them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is solar now cheaper than coal?

For new capacity, yes. The Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) for new utility-scale solar is now $24-96/MWh depending on location, while new coal plants cost $65-160/MWh when built from scratch. Even existing coal plants, which have lower costs because the capital is paid off, are increasingly being undercut by new solar in sunny states. The crossover happened around 2019-2020.

Why does natural gas remain dominant if renewables are cheaper?

Intermittency. Solar generates power during daylight; wind depends on conditions. Natural gas plants can ramp up in minutes to meet any level of demand. The grid needs this "dispatchable" capacity for reliability. As battery storage costs fall, the competitiveness of gas is diminishing, but grid operators will keep substantial gas capacity for decades as a backstop.

What is LCOE and why does it matter?

Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) is the total cost to build and operate a power plant divided by its lifetime electricity output. It allows apples-to-apples comparison across technologies that differ in capital cost, fuel cost, lifespan, and capacity factor. A wind turbine with high upfront cost but zero fuel cost can beat a cheap-to-build gas plant over a 25-year lifetime.

Will renewables ever replace gas entirely?

Eventually, with sufficient storage. The primary barrier is seasonal variation, solar generates far more in summer than winter, and a national grid running on 90%+ renewables would need massive battery storage or long-distance grid connections. EIA projects renewables reaching 50% of US generation by 2030 and continuing to grow, while natural gas remains a significant share for dispatchable backup through at least 2050.

Does renewable energy save money on my electricity bill?

Not directly in the short term. State electricity rates are set by utilities based on their total cost portfolio, not the marginal cost of new generation. Regions with high renewable penetration don't automatically have lower rates, New England has lots of offshore wind potential but high rates due to infrastructure costs. However, as the renewable share grows and fossil fuel costs are displaced, downward pressure on rates increases over time.

What about nuclear, is it renewable?

Nuclear is low-carbon but not classified as renewable because uranium is a finite fuel. Its LCOE for existing plants is competitive ($30-50/MWh), but new nuclear construction is extremely expensive ($130-200/MWh for Vogtle-style large plants). Small modular reactors (SMRs) aim to reduce construction costs significantly but are not yet commercially deployed at scale.

Sources

  • Lazard, Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis v17.0 (2024)
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Annual Energy Outlook 2024
  • EIA, Electric Power Monthly
  • BloombergNEF, New Energy Outlook 2024
  • IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs 2023

LCOE figures are estimates based on current cost assumptions and may differ from actual project economics. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

Worked example: putting the numbers together

Consider two electricity offers in a 1,000-kWh/month household. Plan A: 8.9¢/kWh + $9 monthly fee + $4.50 distribution rider = $89 + $9 + $4.50 = $102.50/month. Plan B: 11.2¢/kWh flat with no riders = $112/month. Plan A appears 26% cheaper per kWh but is only 8.5% cheaper monthly. If the household drops to 500 kWh in shoulder months (April, October), Plan A becomes $44.50 + $13.50 = $58; Plan B becomes $56, Plan A's advantage shrinks to 3%. If the household summer-peaks at 1,800 kWh (heavy AC), Plan A becomes $160.20 + $13.50 = $173.70; Plan B becomes $201.60, Plan A's advantage widens to 13.8%. Variable-usage households benefit more from per-kWh-optimized plans; flat-usage households benefit from bundled-fee-light plans.

Decision-weighted comparison

StateAvg residential rate (¢/kWh)Rank (lowest to highest)Year-over-year change
Idaho9.65#1 (lowest)+2.1%
Washington10.20#3+3.4%
Texas13.40#22+5.2%
California24.50#46+8.7%
Hawaii34.20#50 (highest)+4.1%
US average15.95+5.3%

How to use RateWatt to find your best electricity option

Start with how electricity rates are built to grasp the kWh-plus-fees model, then use state-level rate data to benchmark your bill against your state median. The rate-structure guide walks through fixed, tiered, and time-of-use pricing. For state-by-state comparison, the cheapest-states guide and why prices vary guide show why Idaho and Hawaii sit at opposite ends of the rate curve. The renewable cost comparison covers the levelized-cost-of-energy (LCOE) data behind shifting state generation mixes. Every rate we publish comes from EIA Form 861 (utility annual reports) and EIA Electric Power Monthly, the same data utilities file with FERC.